CHAPTER
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1. BACKGROUND
Speakers
have various ways of saying the same thing. It may arise from the mechanical
limitations of the speech organs for instance speaker may not be fully under
the speaker’s control. The choice of linguistically elements is done by
consciously or unconsciously. Two or more distinct but linguistically
equivalent variants represent the existence of a linguistic variable (Llamas et
al., 2007). Linguistic variable is linguistic unit or a sociolinguistic has
variant in lexical and grammatical, but are most often phonological. For instance British English is (h) which
stands for the presence or absence of /h/ in words such as hammer, house and
hill. Chicano English the levelling of past tense be in ‘We was there,’ (Llamas
et al., 2007). Speakers in Aberdeen, North-East Scotland may choose between the
terms boy, loon, loonie, lad or laddie when referring to a young male person,
or between quine, quinie, lass, lassie, or girl in reference to a young female.
Different words refer to the same things; therefore we can conclude that each
language has a number of varieties (Wardhaugh, 2006).
The
terms of variety language are emerged due to different systems reflecting
different varieties of the human condition. Variety is a specific set of
‘linguistic items’ or ‘human speech patterns’ (presumably, sounds, words,
grammatical features, etc.) which we can connect with some external factor
apparently, a geographical area or a social group (Hudson, 1996; Ferguson, 1972
and Wardhaugh, 2006). Languages can be at variance in lexical, grammatical,
phonological and other ways depends on different social, geographical and other
circumstances determine what elements will be needed and, therefore developed,
and for that reason sociolinguistics believe that such unique sets of items or
patterns do exist (Wardhaugh, 2006).
1.2. PROBLEM
1. What
is language and dialect?
2. What
is regional dialects?
3. What
is social dialects?
4. What
is styles, registers and beliefs?
1.3. OBJECTIVES
1. To
know what is language and dialects.
2. To
know what is regional dialects.
3. To
know what is social dialects.
4. To
know what is styles, registers and beliefs.
CHAPTER
2
DISCUSSION
2.1. LANGUAGE AND DIALECT
Wardhaugh
(2006) distinguish the terms language and dialect as follow: Lower part of
variety language is dialect and as the main part is language, therefore we can
say that Texas English and Swiss German are dialects of English and German.
Some languages have more than one dialect for instance English are spoken in
various dialects. Language and dialect can be the same when language was spoken
by a few people and has only one variety but some expert say it is unsuitable
to say dialect and language is the same because the requirement of lower part
can not be found. We can say also Dialect A, B, C and so on is the part of
language X because it is spoken by many varieties dialect A, B, C. Edward
(2009) also define dialect as a variety of a language that differs from others
along three dimensions: vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation (accent). Because
they are forms of the same language. He states also dialects are mutually
unintelligible. Indeed language is major part of dialect. The others dialect
that is mutually unintelligible for example Dutch and German speaker can not
understand each other even basically both of them have same language, another
example is Mandarin and Cantonese, Thai and Lao, Hindi and Urdu, Serbia and
Croatian etc. Wardhaugh (2006) also distinguish the term vernacular and term
Koine. Vernacular is the speech passed down from parent to child as primary
mode of communication and Koine is speech shared by people of different
vernaculars. UNESCO in Mesthrie (2001) define also vernacular as a language
which is the mother tongue of a group which is socially or politically
dominated by another group speaking a different language. Vernacular
traditionally viewed as the mother tongue of a speaker, the vernacular refers
to non-standard varieties often recognized to stand in contrast with the
standard variety (Llamas et al., 2007). Koine In a broad, it refers to any
common or widely shared variety of language. A narrower definition refer to a
variety of a language, normally showing mixing, levelling and simplification,
which develops as a result of rapid population movement and mixing of speakers
of different dialects in a new community. The term 'koine' originates from
Greek word for 'common' (Mesthrie, 2001).
7 criteria of
language
1.
Standardization : Codification of
language: grammars, spelling books, dictionaries, literature. It is possible to
teach. To make standardization, it require choosing one elite vernacular and it
can be prestigious
2.
Vitality : the existence of a living community of
speakers.
3.
Historicity : a particular
group of people finds their identity by using a particular language
4.
Autonomy : Other speakers of a language must be felt
different from other languages
5.
Reduction : particular
variety may be regarded as a sub-variety rather than as an independent entity.
6.
Mixture : Feelings about the purity or lack of purity
of variety
7.
De facto norms : speakers recognize as
‘good’ speakers and ‘poor’ speakers and that the good speakers represent the
norms of proper usage.
(Adopted from
Wardhaugh, 2006)
The
concepts of ‘power’ and ‘solidarity’ such as status, money, influence,
togetherness feeling can lead people to preserve a local dialect
2.2. REGIONAL DIALECTS
Certain
differences from geographical area one to another in pronunciation, in the
selecting and constructing of words, and in syntax of a language such
distinctive varieties of local variety are called regional dialects (Wardhough,
2006). The study that investigates different varieties on the basis of clusters
of similar and different features in particular regions, towns or villages is
called regional dialectology (Edward, 2009). It is quite interesting that the
discriminations respondents make in exercises like the Map drawing task and the
accent-ordering task are often similar to the discriminations linguists make
between varieties. Dialect–patois distinction is Patois is usually used to
describe only rural forms of speech; we may talk about an urban dialect, but to
talk about an urban patois. Patois also seems to refer only to the speech of
the lower strata in society; again, we may talk about a middle-class dialect
but not, apparently, about a middle-class patois. Finally, a dialect usually
has a wider geographical distribution than a patois. According to Llamas et al.
(2007) patois refer to a non-standard spoken variety and can carry the negative
connotation of ‘uneducated’, and so is rarely used in sociolinguistics. Patois
also well known as local languages in France are characterized by an
'incapacity to serve beyond their limited frameworks' and their speakers have
'difficulties in adapting them to the development of ideas and techniques'
(Mesthrie, 2001). The term patois is found without negative connotation among
some speech communities. Dialect geography is the term used to describe
attempts made to map the distributions of various linguistic features so as to
show their geographical provenance. Now
we go to Dialect vs. Accent section. Dialect is the variety of vocabulary,
syntax, pronunciation. Accent is variety only in pronunciation. Accent also
well-known as RP (receive pronunciation). Standard English as the prestige
dialect of British English, prescribed in official and formal settings and
approved for writing in the education system. RP is standard accent which can
be taught and it is prestigious. British accent is preferred one to teach
because it is lack a regional association within England. It is also known as
BBC, Oxford, Queen English, and being Standard English in England. It tends to
be spoken by educated speakers regardless of geographical origin.
2.3. SOCIAL DIALECTS
Social
dialect is difference speech associate with various social groups. Social
dialects create among social groups and are related to a variety of factors
such as social class, religion, and ethnicity. In India, for example, caste is
one of the clearest of all social differentiators. Branch of linguistic study
that linguistically city characterized is called social dialectology.
Ethnic group in USA AAVE (African American
Vernacular English), also known as Ebonics, Black English (BE), Black English
Vernacular (BEV) show hyper corrective tendencies in that they tend to overdo
certain imitative behaviors freely use the habitual form of misapplication
rules. Hyper correction is the overgeneralization of linguistic forms which
carry obvious social prestige often through the misapplication of rules (e.g.
allows deletion ‘They are going’ can become ‘They going’ and dog pronounce as
the vocal of book : dug).
2.4. STYLES, REGISTERS AND BELIEFS
'style'
relates to the typical ways in which one or more people do a particular thing.
Style in language behavior thus becomes alternative ways of expressing the same
content. Style is the way speakers speak, the speaker also can make a choice
weather informal and formal, it depends on circumstance and the age and social
group of participant (Wardhaugh, 2006). Registers refer to particular ways of
using language in particular settings within that community. Register is a set
of linguistic items were associated with discrete occupational and social
groups. Surgeons, airline pilots, bank managers, sales clerks, jazz fans, and
pimps employ different registers, they develop similar vocabulary and
intonation we also talk about dialect,
register, and style independently, we may talk casually in local variety of
language, write formal technical study and also making judgment “better or
worse” to speaker who has the same background. And about belief is systems of
ideas or ideology, some people believed that certain language is lack of
grammar, we can speak English without accent. Also English is believed false
language; pronunciation is based on spelling, and slipping language. The
representations of belief can operate the interests of an identifiable social
class or cultural group. This tendency will create language behavior and
attitude by several group of people act or behave toward language differently
and sociolinguist should strive for understanding how people behave toward
language and linguistic feature rely on person as being particular place, a
social class members, and specific profession.
CHAPTER
3
CONCLUSION
3.1. LANGUAGE AND DIALECT
Wardhaugh
(2006) distinguish the terms language and dialect as follow: Lower part of
variety language is dialect and as the main part is language, therefore we can
say that Texas English and Swiss German are dialects of English and German. Language
and dialect can be the same when language was spoken by a few people and has
only one variety but some expert say it is unsuitable to say dialect and
language is the same because the requirement of lower part can not be found.
Edward (2009) also define dialect as a variety of a language that differs from
others along three dimensions: vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation (accent).
He states also dialects are mutually unintelligible. Indeed language is major
part of dialect. The others dialect that is mutually unintelligible for example
Dutch and German speaker can not understand each other even basically both of
them have same language, another example is Mandarin and Cantonese, Thai and
Lao, Hindi and Urdu, Serbia and Croatian etc. Wardhaugh (2006) also distinguish
the term vernacular and term Koine.
7 criteria of language
1. Standardization
2. Vitality
3. Historicity
4. Autonomy
5. Reduction
6. Mixture
7. De
facto norms
(Adopted from Wardhaugh, 2006)
3.2. REGIONAL DIALECTS
Certain
differences from geographical area one to another in pronunciation, in the
selecting and constructing of words, and in syntax of a language such
distinctive varieties of local variety are called regional dialects (Wardhough,
2006). The study that investigates different varieties on the basis of clusters
of similar and different features in particular regions, towns or villages is
called regional dialectology (Edward, 2009).
3.3. SOCIAL DIALECTS
Social
dialect is difference speech associate with various social groups. Social
dialects create among social groups and are related to a variety of factors
such as social class, religion, and ethnicity.
3.4. STYLES, REGISTERS AND BELIEF
'style'
relates to the typical ways in which one or more people do a particular thing.
Style in language behavior thus becomes alternative ways of expressing the same
content. Style is the way speakers speak, the speaker also can make a choice
weather informal and formal, it depends on circumstance and the age and social
group of participant (Wardhaugh, 2006). Registers refer to particular ways of
using language in particular settings within that community. Register is a set
of linguistic items were associated with discrete occupational and social
groups. Belief
is systems of ideas or ideology, some people believed that certain language is
lack of grammar, we can speak English without accent.
REFERENCES
1. Edward
(2009). Language and Identity: An
Introduction. Cambridge University Press: New York
2. Llamas
et al. Eds. (2007). The Routledge
Companion to Sociolinguistics. Routledge: New York
3. Meyerhoff
M. (2006). Introducing Sociolinguistics.
Routledge: New York
4. Mesthrie
R Eds. (2001). Concise Encyclopedia of
Sociolinguistics Elsevier: UK
5. Wardhaugh
R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics
Fifth Edition. Blackwell Publishing: Australia
6. Yule
G. (2010). The Study of Language Fourth
Edition. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
7. Yule
G. (2006). The Study of Language Third Edition.
Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
makasih info nya
BalasHapusMaaf, saya ijin copy artikel ini. Thank
BalasHapus